Getting rejection letters?
Got Snarked?
"Get over it" not quite doing the trick?
Herewith a link from MB Toolbox with directions for making lemonade with all those damn lemons Fresh Direct just delivered.
Categories
- Agent Protocol (45)
- aw hell (6)
- aw hell (as requested) (1)
- Be Miss Snark (4)
- Beverage alerts (11)
- bucko (1)
- Business cards (1)
- can't hurt (2)
- Clooney Love (7)
- clues (1)
- conferences (17)
- contests (9)
- craft (5)
- Crapometer status report (2)
- crapometer-cover letters (19)
- Crapometer-first pages (63)
- Crapometer-hooks (736)
- Crapometer-synopsis (106)
- electron woes (16)
- exclusives stink (6)
- firing your agent (3)
- format (5)
- Heads up (9)
- Housekeeping (10)
- hubba hubba (2)
- IOM (51)
- Killer Yapp (2)
- Library Thing (1)
- Miss Snark is amused (62)
- Miss Snark is amused avec vous (1)
- Miss Snark sets her hair on fire (5)
- Miss Snark was WRONG (1)
- NF queries (5)
- Nitwittery abounds (31)
- NO (did I mention no often enough yet) (3)
- No no no (29)
- No no no NO (did I mention no often enough yet) (2)
- oh my-exclamation point (18)
- oh yea (3)
- other voices other rooms (4)
- partials (1)
- Predictions (2)
- promotions (1)
- pub credits (9)
- Publicity (4)
- QnA (67)
- query letters (96)
- Quit obsessing (16)
- Rants (41)
- Read this (6)
- rights (3)
- sase (2)
- Snark Central (15)
- snarkasaurus (3)
- snarktistics (2)
- Style (8)
- sucka (1)
- synopses (2)
- Terminology (14)
- That's Mr. Yapp to you (2)
- this crazy industry (6)
- useful info (7)
- WFHisT (5)
- writers blogs (2)
- WWMSD (1)
Blog Archive
-
►
2007
(585)
- ► 06/03 - 06/10 (1)
- ► 05/20 - 05/27 (3)
- ► 05/13 - 05/20 (19)
- ► 05/06 - 05/13 (30)
- ► 04/29 - 05/06 (10)
- ► 04/22 - 04/29 (22)
- ► 04/15 - 04/22 (28)
- ► 04/08 - 04/15 (31)
- ► 04/01 - 04/08 (28)
- ► 03/25 - 04/01 (37)
- ► 03/18 - 03/25 (78)
- ► 03/11 - 03/18 (33)
- ► 03/04 - 03/11 (23)
- ► 02/25 - 03/04 (30)
- ► 02/18 - 02/25 (15)
- ► 02/11 - 02/18 (37)
- ► 02/04 - 02/11 (17)
- ► 01/28 - 02/04 (33)
- ► 01/21 - 01/28 (21)
- ► 01/14 - 01/21 (37)
- ► 01/07 - 01/14 (52)
-
►
2005
(915)
- ► 12/25 - 01/01 (90)
- ► 12/18 - 12/25 (31)
- ► 12/11 - 12/18 (58)
- ► 12/04 - 12/11 (62)
- ► 11/27 - 12/04 (59)
- ► 11/20 - 11/27 (57)
- ► 11/13 - 11/20 (50)
- ► 11/06 - 11/13 (7)
- ► 10/30 - 11/06 (36)
- ► 10/23 - 10/30 (35)
- ► 10/16 - 10/23 (22)
- ► 10/09 - 10/16 (32)
- ► 10/02 - 10/09 (30)
- ► 09/25 - 10/02 (38)
- ► 09/18 - 09/25 (32)
- ► 09/11 - 09/18 (21)
- ► 09/04 - 09/11 (27)
- ► 08/28 - 09/04 (94)
- ► 08/14 - 08/21 (1)
- ► 08/07 - 08/14 (28)
- ► 07/31 - 08/07 (40)
- ► 07/24 - 07/31 (22)
- ► 07/17 - 07/24 (11)
- ► 07/10 - 07/17 (7)
- ► 07/03 - 07/10 (15)
- ► 06/26 - 07/03 (9)
- ► 03/27 - 04/03 (1)
-
►
2004
(1)
- ► 03/28 - 04/04 (1)
13 comments:
Or you can just make the rejection letters into toilet paper, like the fine folks at lulu.com offer.
Thanks Miss Snark! I'm now going out to jog a mile per rejection letter---I'll either get over them or just get realllly in shape!
Thanks MS.
Check out www.newhousebooks.com.
Vanity/not Vanity?
Curious?
She's a former agent.
My favorite strategy is to immediately exercise after a discouraging event. Not only does exercising increase energy and release endorphin which makes you feel better, but by successfully completing my workout I can stop negative cycles of thought quickly.
I make plenty of lemonade on my elliptical machine. At this rate (of rejection) I'll be headed to the Ironman Triathalon...
So successfully watching tv for 4 hours while successfully eating potato chips doesn't count - who knew?
Miss snark...
what do you think of the site Agent TurnAround Time?
http://community.livejournal.com/agentturnaround/profile
Here's how crucial a rejection is:
Stepan Chapman received over forty rejections for his novel, 'The Troika' before finding a small publisher who thought the book was fabulous. It ended up winning the Philip K. Dick award for that year.
Thanks. Very meaningful.
Thank you Miss Snark.
Thank you, Miss Snark. This is fabulous! I can just hear my grandmother saying, "Pull yourself up by your bootstraps!"
Check out www.newhousebooks.com.
Vanity/not Vanity?
My vote would be, vanity, based on these observations:
1) Home page targeted at authors, not readers;
2) Link on home page to "consulting services";
3) "Newhouse Books specializes in short-run titles and only works in financial partnership with its authors, sharing costs." (my emphasis);
4) Refusal to accept submissions from agents.
I have two words for this situation. Valium - Prozac. Victory through chemistry!
Rgds........Ski
Post a Comment