12.20.2006

Notes on numbering

I was posting these in chron-received order and got lazy about checking the numbers to make sure they matched. I'm off by about four and I'm not sure why, and I'm not spending more than ten seconds on the problem cause, well, I've got enough to do.

I'll post the number that keeps it in the right order first then in parens you'll see the number I mailed you.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thank dog that's all that is. I thought maybe when you get into higher writing, they have some sort of writer's periodic table and those numbers in parenth's were our "atomic hook weight". ;)

Anonymous said...

Thank dog that's all that is. I thought maybe when you get into higher writing, they have some sort of writer's periodic table and those numbers in parenth's were our "atomic hook weight". ;)

Elektra said...

Noooooo! This means four more before you get to 372!

skybluepinkrose said...

LOL, anon.

Anonymous said...

Hey elektra, at least you're not in the 400's. Sigh. Drum the fingers.

cm allison said...

electra,
Patience, grasshopper.

Short-timing to your crap-o-meter number isn't the same as short-timing to vacation (or better yet, resignation!!!!). I have to wait much longer, and find zen like peace in reading the entries and comments, and I learn. (When I'm not spewing tea over my work key-board)

xiqay said...

atomic hook weight-LOL!

And I second electra--a wait of an extra 4 before you get to mine. Aagh. (revising projected timeline to snarking).